Statistical Significance Calculator for Two Proportions

Compare two success rates with a pooled two-proportion z-test and report p-value, z statistic, absolute difference, and relative lift.

Statistical significance for two proportions

The pooled two-proportion z-test evaluates a null hypothesis that two population proportions are equal. It uses observed successes and sample sizes from two independent groups.

Choose the alternative hypothesis before interpreting the p-value. Statistical significance is not the same as practical importance, and valid inference still depends on sampling and experiment design.

How to use the two-proportion z-test calculator

  1. Enter both groups: Provide whole-number successes and sample sizes.
  2. Choose the alternative: Select two-sided, group 2 greater, or group 2 less.
  3. Set α: Use a significance level chosen before examining results.
  4. Run the test: Review p-value, effect estimates, and any approximation warning.

Formula and variables

The null-hypothesis standard error uses the pooled proportion p̂ = (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂).

z = (p̂₂ − p̂₁)/√[p̂(1−p̂)(1/n₁ + 1/n₂)]
xSuccesses
Observed successes in a group
nSample size
Independent observations in a group
Sample proportion
Observed successes divided by sample size
αSignificance level
Preselected rejection threshold

Conversion-rate comparison

Control has 100 conversions from 1,000 users and variant has 130 from 1,000.

Control
100 / 1,000
Variant
130 / 1,000
Alternative
Two-sided
  1. p̂₁ = 0.10; p̂₂ = 0.13
  2. Compute the pooled standard error and z statistic

Result: The two-sided p-value is approximately 0.0365.

At α = 0.05 the test rejects equal proportions, while the 3-point absolute difference describes effect size.

Understanding your results

Interpret p-value with effect size

The p-value describes compatibility with the null model, not the size or value of an effect.

  • Absolute difference is p̂₂ − p̂₁.
  • Relative lift uses group 1 as baseline.
  • A one-sided alternative must be selected in advance.
  • Small expected counts call for an exact or alternative method.

Assumptions

  • Groups are independent and observations within groups are suitably independent.
  • The large-sample normal approximation is appropriate.
  • The analysis plan and alternative hypothesis were selected without outcome-driven switching.

Limitations

  • Does not provide an exact test, confidence interval, power analysis, sequential-testing correction, or multiple-comparison correction.
  • Does not correct confounding, selection bias, attrition, peeking, or instrumentation problems.
  • Relative lift is undefined when group 1 has zero successes.

Common mistakes

  • Entering rates instead of success counts.
  • Changing from two-sided to one-sided after seeing results.
  • Equating p < α with a large or important effect.
  • Ignoring repeated looks or multiple tested variants.

Practical use cases

A/B experiments

Compare two large-sample conversion rates after a valid randomized experiment.

Statistics coursework

Check pooled two-proportion z-test arithmetic.

Frequently asked questions

What does p < 0.05 mean?

Under the null model and assumptions, a result at least this extreme has probability below 0.05; it does not prove the alternative or measure effect size.

When should I avoid this z-test?

Avoid relying on the normal approximation when expected success or failure counts are small or observations are dependent.

Sources and review

Reviewed 2026-07-14.

Continue with calculators that answer nearby questions and help compare the next step.